Syntax sugar (Pipe-calculus): Difference between revisions

Created page with "Thoughtful application of syntax sugar makes programs easy to read, more compact and familiar to programmers. The syntax extensions described here are lightweight and well-defined. == Let ... in == <math> \def\seq{\mathrel{;}} \def\succeed{\textbf{succeed}} \def\alt{\mid} \def\fail{\textbf{fail}} \def\pipe{\rhd} \def\pass{\textbf{pass}} \def\in{\,?} \def\out{!} \def\rew{\mathrel{\Rightarrow}\,} </math> <math>\mathsf{let}</math> is a popular construct in functional lang..."
(Created page with "Thoughtful application of syntax sugar makes programs easy to read, more compact and familiar to programmers. The syntax extensions described here are lightweight and well-defined. == Let ... in == <math> \def\seq{\mathrel{;}} \def\succeed{\textbf{succeed}} \def\alt{\mid} \def\fail{\textbf{fail}} \def\pipe{\rhd} \def\pass{\textbf{pass}} \def\in{\,?} \def\out{!} \def\rew{\mathrel{\Rightarrow}\,} </math> <math>\mathsf{let}</math> is a popular construct in functional lang...")
(No difference)
283

edits